from chaos to order
What I want to know the interests of the news with which we fill the national news.
Seeking to do with neurotic channels which speaks of the Biennale of, you know that thing ... where are exhibited the works of many artists, mostly unknown, which give rise to the collective laughter, sometimes helped, then not so unconsciously, from movies like "Vacation smart" Alberto Sordi.
Find news, because I know that my feeling is shared by others, those I met during my ii-day visit, the gardens, the arsenal.
I must admit that with this theme, "Making Worlds," the editor Birnbaum, she wanted to bring the artist in the middle of the event, completely disengaging from the noble art criticism. The result is a multiplicity of languages \u200b\u200band expressions that live among them, apparently in the form discordant, the key to understanding must be extended further, move away from the logic of mere observation that is likely to lead astray.
La Biennale itself with Birnbaum in turn becomes a work in which the audience participates, rather it is the essential element. Unlike the old forms of artistic expression where the artist required the contribution of the public, in this case, this experimental phase appears to be metabolized completely, overcome by the artists who already provide for participation, not required but unconsciously granted. The game, became the cornerstone, the common thread that unites the various works. Issue apparently not required but as usually happens in almost all the works, as if the artists, even after thousands of miles have something that allows them to get in touch. Not notice this aspect hide a key that allows us to appreciate more fully the works. It is not easy to recognize the meaning of art in this magma human persons, each a character who tries to mean something. There want to dress up, but the desire for freedom, the desire to be themselves. The public thus becomes the work and is reflected in himself and in the works.
The criticism that I have read comments, compare this with the previous edition, but I fear that prior to aseptic reign bias, which is the fundamental enemy of reading a work of art. "I would have done differently?".
No do not tell me you would have done differently, help me to understand concretely what happens here in these huge spaces.
Artists have, as expected, allowing humans to overcome the critical of any approach to the art to understand it, to have a clue about the closest to his needs. Not a clue "literary" but a giant trail between reality and creativity. The ability to enter the color, design, up to understand the actual use and starting a process of repositioning, putting things in place well.
This chaos, which is the origin of life, allows me to get close touch works seemingly insignificant. No we should not stop at the surface, I look and I understand the commitment of everyone, where is aware that there is at stake the future of every artist.
This apparent chaos, Babel is away from the over and opens his eyes to a world in perfect balance, as if it were a biosphere that regulates itself and is able to survive despite the mutations. Not disorder, but strict order reign supreme here. The external influences and tensions have increased, tempered this body ready for the journey. Now the art is able to cope because it is able to finally claim its real strength dropped from outside elements that repeatedly have tried to confine them.
My reference to the system of art is intentional, not accidental, for too long artists have been hostage to the choices and logic stored.
Today all this has blown, the artist shows how he wants to be free to speak with the language we want in this area and able to reclaim his world, his way of being.
The Italy pavilion curated by critics Beatrice / Buscaroli, has this breath, the artists have worked hard, challenged by the theme "recover the vitality of this movement." There is no dissonance between this issue and the "Making Worlds", as some have suggested, assuming a return of Italian art in series C.
Instead, there will emerge and bring the Italian art at the international level that it deserves.
Luca Beatrice, who has repeatedly pointed out, in very difficult times, the absence from the Italian international scene, I have deliberately engage in a transaction by global treaties, and the operation's successful.
Even in this "testing" is an Italian art world, it must be a member to the end, highlighting those that are our strengths, not only always and only declined in comparison with the past, but oriented finally to a vision of current proposal of Italian art.
So I wonder, but the artists have succeeded in their aim?
They succeeded, or at least be able to regain possession of their land to suit them, the relationship with the public?
Looking at the works on display I think we have tried hard, with their games, their colors, and the ability of the trustee, to bring more and more art in daily life as the installation of Tobias Rehberger, who won the Golden Lion for best artist, creating a café.
Here the contribution of the unconscious result is confirmed one hundred percent. What would such a Café without customers?
So with the same key to be read most of the works of the artists, no longer a biennial in the image of the critics, no longer in the image of the viewer, but highly concentrated on the artist, unique, chaotic but true protagonist.
Is not it a bit 'too the spirit of scream?
Domenico Gioia June 7, 2009
